Spread the word.

23 February 2011

Racist white girl's parents outraged over school bus scuffle. Another fake hate-crime brought to you by Faux.

A consequence of more than a decade of racial indoctrination by a white girl's parents ends in her starting a fight with African refugees. She was asked out by a refugee boy, and instead of either just politely saying no, or broadening her horizons by saying yes, she starts arguments(probably racially motivated) with these Black refugees. The boys, having already been traumatized by life in some of the most wrecked parts of Westerner-violated Africa, now have to deal with taunting and ridicule from a racist white girl(the same people that caused all of the hurt and pain in their native land.) on a daily basis, all as reward for the simple polite gesture of asking her out on a date. There's no telling(although we can all safely guess...) the words used to verbally attack these refugee boys, but it couldn't have been pretty. This all culminates in a fight on the school bus. No one knows who started the fight, but given the facts, I think it's pretty safe to assume she did. After all, after it happened, she claims that she was attacked weeks prior, but SOMEHOW didn't say anything(covering tracks, trying to gain sympathy...)? As though white people ever miss an opportunity to claim black on white crime.

Hilariously transparent.

So it should have died there, with all parties involved getting a dose of counseling and what not, but no... It's never that simple is it? Count on FauxNews to never miss an opportunity to shout "black on white crime" from the mountain tops, in their quest to turn America back 50 years:

FauxNews Fair and balanced report.


And of course the girls mom to over dramatize the so-called crime, and basically deify her "victim" daughter, of course:

"She has always been a well liked girl with lots of friends, and a passion for humanity. She's known for standing up for those who can't stand up for themselves giving them a voice and the courage to stand up for themselves."



My Daughter's "Assault"


/shrug. For the so-called viciousness of the so-called attack, all her own mother's website has to show is a puffy lip. Yes, this is clearly the crime of the century, as FauxNews and the probably-racist parents would have you believe. Puffy lips are leaps and bounds above the rape of entire continents and billions of people.

08 February 2011

Texas murders young Latino woman: Racists cheer.

Fox News readers encourage the killing of Latino cancer patients.

"we need to document each and every one we deport, so we can execute them if they show back up."  - Greywolfrs
 "Good luck collecting on that bill. Lazy, shiftless, criminal, that is Mexico summed up for you."  -Barefooted


In today's world one would think we would have evolved beyond border politics and embraced the community of mankind, but in racist Texas the grumpy old white men predictably are resisting. Instead of treating a poor woman for a deadly tumor, the Texas government is just going to allow a hospital to send her off to die, guess saving lives just isn't profitable enough down in Galveston.

What's even more amazing is the flood of racist whites on the FoxNews.com comments board that almost unanimously agree with the killing of a young woman just because she is one of those "dirty brown people" that can't fork out enough money to buy life. Bunch of savages.

While it is indeed sad that she is being forced into such a bad situation by the powers that be, it is actions like this that will make it all the more satisfying when the oppressive white christian power structure is finally out numbered and replaced here in a couple decades("Aztlan Inevitable" as a good example). Just a matter of time, hope she has that much.

So there you have it, another wild reaction by the current power structure in The West flailing about in panic over the coming demographic changes.

29 January 2011

Hate-Crime committing white boy becomes internet "victim"

Police Seek Suspects in YouTube Beating

This video has been making the rounds, showing some white guy getting "jumped" by a couple African Americans. The reality is entirely different though, which is interesting.

For a full run down of the light scuffle see the play-by-play here:

Play-by-play of Brothers protecting their own.

By watching the video closely you can see that the white is on top of a Black man beating him before his fellow Blacks to to the rescue. They then taught a mild lesson to the would be hate-crime offender by roughing him up a little. Excessive? I dunno, maybe. But you can't blame them, spending their entire lives being abused by the white man that they want to get a few lumps in of their own.

Most importantly , though, is that this video starts much after the altercation began. The white guy apparently made some racial remarks that started the mess and then tried to get out of town once he sparked the righteous anger of the Black men. What you really see though is just another desperate attempt by the white man to use racial victimization the same way the Races of the world use them. "Oh, look at us, we're the victims now! Whaaaaaa!"


Just makes them look stupid though.

Baby killer demands free house.

"While Sgt. James B. Hurley was away at war, he lost a heartbreaking battle at home."

Yeah, heartbreaking, indeed. Boohoo. So he runs off to war and makes Muslims homeless for a living, and now he's crying about the same thing happening to him. Never mind he was getting paid higher hazard pay and his cold blooded army wife refused to pay the bills, instead probably counting on special anti-foreclosure privileges given to Amerika's foreign murder patrol.

Maybe they will change their evil ways now.

12 October 2009

You wouldn't want a bloodletter teaching in Med School, would you?

It seems every conservative political writer you read from on the web thinks that there is a huge "Liberal Bias" in university level education. David Horowitz is the prime example of this type of defective thinker. It's hard for him to go more than a week on FrontPageMag without another ridiculous, whiny rant about this so called bias. The puppets over at Students For Academic Freedom have an entire site dedicated to attempting to force colleges into teaching backwards conservative politics. In their so-called Academic Bill of Rights the SAF details a tragically hilarious list of "rights" they think should be pushed on academia. Some of the funnier highlights:

"2. No faculty member will be excluded from tenure, search and hiring committees on the basis of their political or religious beliefs."

"6. Selection of speakers, allocation of funds for speakers programs and other student activities will observe the principles of academic freedom and promote intellectual pluralism."

Taken word for word, neither of those statements is contentious in the least, but then you have to consider the source. You see, when they SAY they want pluralism, what they MEAN is they want to get rid of progressives and replace them by conservatives. And when they SAY they don't want professors discriminated against based on ideology they are hopelessly hypocritical in that they claim the progressives in academia are somehow dangerous because of their beliefs.

Consider this: Would you want a professor teaching future doctors in med school only how to use leeches and bloodletting? No? Well, all the other professors are teaching modern medicine, so it's only fair that this man be allowed to teach outdated medieval medicine regardless of how ineffective it is PURELY because professors of that methodology are underrepresented in medical schools. I mean you have GOT to have differing opinions at the university or else it's just not fair, right?

How about in biological sciences? In the sake of fairness you have just GOT to have some clown teaching Creationism instead of Evolution. Who cares if it is a woefully outdated and religious school of "thought", it's all about putting people with those viewpoints in as professors for the sake of so-called fairness.

Well, that's the reason why Conservatives are greatly underrepresented at the university level compared to Progressives. Conservative thought is equally outdated and useless in the political arena as Creationism is in Biology, and Bloodletting/Leeching is in Medicine. The mind is a terrible thing to waste... on backwards conservative thinking.

06 October 2009

White's far and away the most racist according to dating info released by OkCupid.

Interesting article confirming what everyone already knows. White people are still racist even though most will try and pretend that since we have a Black president racism is behind us.

From Your Race Affects Whether People Write You Back:
"White guys are shitty... The average reply rate of non-white males is 48.1%, while white guys’ is only 40.5%. Basically, they write back about 20% less often. It’s ironic that white guys are worst responders,..."

The graph at the bottom of the post just puts the final nail in the coffin as it points out that whites are MORE than 3 times as likely to believe that interracial relationships are a bad idea than the more humane races at the top of the graph. So then, we know the problem(racist whites) but what is the solution? My idea would be for the algorithms on dating sites that determine compatibility to place a greater compatibility weight to non-white races than to other whites. Just for example, under my system, a white woman who is against dating men of other races would keep being bombarded by the fact that most of her "matches" were not white after all. This could partially counterbalance her tendencies and force her to think "Well, maybe white men AREN'T really the only ones worth considering." Besides, if you can't educate the racism out of white society, maybe it would be easier to just breed it out of them?

13 May 2008

Aztlan: Inevitable

Enough said, really. The immigration debate has been won. While delusional/racist conservatives still think there is hope for their side, anyone with a brain knows that the debate is over. Not that I really want to rub it in, but any time I see people arguing about Immigrant rights, I have to laugh a little. Backwater suburbs in Texas that single out Latinos with their illegal political games can hardly do anything in their own towns, much less have any real effect on the nation as a whole.

The facts:

1) There is no stopping the demographic shift. The American Empire's Southwest will eventually be returned to it's rightful owners, there is no stopping this. Whether the Southwest will ever actually leave the US to rejoin Mexico, or if it symbolically remains a part of the US in name only doesn't matter.

2) The politics are on our side. Any conservative point can simply be rightfully shrugged off as bigoted and racist, and any pro-immigrant rights argument automatically is seen as compassionate and progressive.

Moral of the story? If Progressive minded folks can learn the lessons of the Immigration debate, and point out the bigotry in all the other conservative agendas, we will defeat them in every respect. For the next few decades where white people are still a relevant demographic, one of the most effective tools for changing public opinion is reminding them of the institutional bigotry they create in their political systems. If only shrugging off the political influence of the loony religious ones was as easy.

04 May 2008

Vicarious Racial Politics: vol 1

Theres nothing white conservatives more than being able to bash Blacks vicariously through the words of a Black man. After all, if Bill Cosby points out problems with the Black community, it's A-OK for whites to twist those words around for their own use. Which is all the more reason to for any minority community leader to think long and hard before selling their People out and joining conservative causes. It hurts the most when they can be used as the "token minority friend" of whichever racially harmful political measures they are pushing. Just look at how much white right wingers LOVE a man like Walter Williams for example. Nothing hurts our causes more than this.

Random_rightwingnut: 'Hey, it's OK if I'm against Affirmative Action, so is <Black conservative>! Therefore, I'm not a racist, but here's 12 pages of racial prejudice on my website and support of racist politics I think I can get away with now!'

Something I found to be fun? Google "I love Walter Williams" and see how many right wing sites you can find that use his articles in the same site that they have racially harmful views against minority groups(anti-affirmative action, anti-reparations, anti-immigration rights, ect...)

I had to stop after I saw the phrase word for word in a forum about Sean Hannity. Yuck.

Reverse-Reverse Discrimination vol. 1

Stop the presses, get ACLU on the line, David Horowitz is being discriminated against again! Or so he would have you believe. You have to give it to DH though, being able to so shamelessly lie and play the victim as though he doesn't realize how silly he looks is quite the talent. This article(My Encounter With the Enemy in Milwaukee) is a perfect example of how Horowitz can go about horribly bigoted actions against Muslims, get called out on it, and still manage to try and turn it around as though his rights are being threatened. Astounding.

Step 1: Slander Muslims and legitimate Islamic student organizations by putting deliberately inflammatory attack ad's on campuses.
"We then drew up an ad which described the MSA as group that “postures as just another campus religious and cultural organization, and gets special privileges for being that, but is in fact “a radical political group that was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, the godfather of Al-Qaeda and Hamas...”"
Step 2: Absorb and remember all of the well deserved backlash from such racist actions that is sent your way, and get ready to use that backlash that you baited for.
"Three papers didn’t respond. Of the 7 that published the ad, three – the Daily Nexus at UC Santa Barbara, the Daily Collegian at Penn State and the Post at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee were immediately attacked as “Islamophobic” and “racist” and having caused Muslims to fear for their safety."
Step 3: Cry woe-is-me and pretend that you are the victim. Being a self-made martyr helps sell ad-space in Neocon Land.
"...members of the MSA had torn down 2,000 flyers posted to advertise my event, and surrounded students distributing our pamphlet at a table while screaming “cancel the speech.”"
Bravo David, bravo. Horowitz is a perfect example of how to make a living catering to wannabe-victimized right wingers. Sounds pretty easy, actually, maybe I'll give it a try if the bills ever start to pile up.

Edit: I do appreciate the fact that he at least put the caricature of himself into the article. I found it hilarious as well as true, and would have never had the pleasure of seeing it otherwise.

03 May 2008

Distorting Video vol. 1

Watch:

Pro-War counter-protesters Attack Peace Demonstration

It's obvious to anyone watching that the pro-war savages incited the conflict, escalating all the way to the point of a large man getting into an altercation with a small woman before the real melee breaks out.
Upon viewing this for the first time, my thought was: "I wonder how the right-wing nuts are going to try and spin this?"
A quick google of "swartout video conservative blog" turns up about what you would expect on the first page, enough spin to make even O'Reilly dizzy.

An example from the very first hit includes the delightful bashing of a man in a wheel-chair:
The continuing Swartout saga

Jonn wrote: "Well, using your wheelchair to bump Mr. Swartout and pump up the rage at this incident didn’t help much. It’s clear in the second video that you intended to do bodily harm to someone and then use your wheelchair as an emotional shield."
Wow, way to stick it to the handicapped, big man.

The second site that came up is the aptly named "RightWingNews", with hate built right into the domain name, you know it's got to be good.

First, the spin by the original poster:

Cassy Fiano posts, "How is it that no arrests were made? This video makes it pretty clear that an assault had taken place.
This family did nothing to provoke this kind of attack. As they pointed out to the irate peace thugs over and over again, both groups were in a public place. The only unhinged and out-of-control people there were the peace thugs."


Second, some brilliant commentary by a resident conservative goon promoting murder. Typical garbage comments from a rightwing hate-site:

Posted by assassin6, "All it would take to end this kind of behavior is one of the Pro-troops people having a concealed-carry permit and using the lawful weapon to plant some of these attackers in the ground. Word would get around and suddenly the "brave and courageous" peace protesters would end these assaults."
Moral of the story, if conservatives can't use unarmed violence to break up your rally, they'll most certainly have wet dreams about breaking it up with firearms.